Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 October 23

< October 22	October 24 >

October 23

File:Hydril Annular BOP Patent App.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 31. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydril Annular BOP Patent App.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HCS Aerial Shot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq (talk) 17:38, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Old Deanery HCS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is uploaded as a non-free image. However, the source site indicates this image is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 which is an acceptable free license for Wikipedia. I assume it was uploaded due to copyright concerns as the subject of the photo is a building. My understanding is that photos of buildings in the UK are covered by freedom of panorama and this should actually be relicensed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 (aand maybe moved to Commons?). Whpq (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Banknotes are not created by Wikipedia users but by governments/central banks. No evidence of permission from the issuing government/central bank. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Niagara075 filtered.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, needs clearer soucing, authorship ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sea-games-19.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo design is not necessarily uploaders to relicense. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISyllabus logo.tiff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as self but Logo design for third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly a non-free logo. I have changed the licensing to non-free logo and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Asean-para-games-logo.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non trival third party logo, and external source given, How is this a self work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASEAN PARA Games.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, How is this self work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo-2019-sea games.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, How is this self? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AgrarianParty.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, how is this a self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fair use file with a lack of critical commentary for its use in Opinion polling for the Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2019. Salavat (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The non-textual part of this logo is on Commons at File:Agrarnaya-partiya-logo.png. If the Commons file is not PD-logo, then the Commons file should probably be nominated for deletion there and the Wikipedia file might perhaps be converted to NFC for the article "Agrarian Party of Ukraine". If the Commons file is PD-logo, then this full version with the text could probably be uploaded to Commons and deleted from en.wikipedia. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NashiParty.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, How is this self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fair use file with a lack of critical commentary for its use in Opinion polling for the Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2019. Salavat (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The uploader's claim of copyright is suspect, but can't this image pass as PD-logo? -- Asclepias (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PUFC-logo-ph.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third pary logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly a non-free logo. I have changed the licensing to non-free logo and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo-2019-para games.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, How is this self/own work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:00, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unused logo - may even be a made up one modified from other logos. -- Whpq (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui Removal Notification.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This was apparently uploaded under a self license, but would seem to be an official Pakistan govt document. Are these copyright free? The license needs updating in any event ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' - It's clearly a Pakistan government document. Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Pakistan the document is copyrighted. Conversion to non-free use not an option as this document is not needed as the removal is provided in text in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As pointed out by Whpq. It is a copyrighted work by the Pakistan government; moreover there is no needed use of the image. Gotitbro (talk) 06:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TCI Network logotype.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense(d) to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo design, how is the self or own work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly a non-free logo. I have changed the licensing to non-free logo and added a fair use. Salavat (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TimeTraveler SDC Entrance.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sign is an artwork with a seperate copyright, this cannot be solely a self license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Three-dimensional artwork that includes the ride's logo, so wouldn't freedom of panorama satisfy? --McDoob AU93 13:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ride is located in the United States, which doesn't necessarily have freedom of panorama for some works.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete US FoP is for buildings only. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.