Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 22

< June 21	June 23 >

June 22

File:SteelsGraph999.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (and outdated?) chart, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FPHcare-logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: at least PD-USonly (see New Zealand TOO) czar 16:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to fall under PD-USOnly, although the SVG may be copyrightable - Pakaraki, did you make that SVG yourself? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't make that company logo. The svg image is from the latest annual report, at the URL indicated at File:FPHcare-logo.svg. The company website claims copyright for content on that website, so I don't expect this logo could be considered as being in the public domain, but use with the Wikipedia article about this company is appropriate and fair use. --Pakaraki (talk) 09:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pakaraki: The source website you give does not show any SVG files. Did you make the SVG starting from another filetype? The reason I am asking is because not all things in the world can be copyrighted (the apparel of that logo for example most likely cannot be copyrighted in the US) but the file format matters, if this makes sense.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jo-Jo Eumerus:, the logo is embedded in the annual report pdf file as a vector image. All I did was extract it to a svg file. --Pakaraki (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike-ohearn-bodypower-678x381.jpg?189db0.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn - for some reason the license didn't display before... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see evidence that this image is under the given license in the source website. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kurt Geiger Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: PD in US only, barring a typeface originality analysis czar 16:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear cut text logo. Only question would be if it's unoriginal enough even in the United Kingdom. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prisoner by Steve Angello featuring Gary Go.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: likely beneath threshold of originality czar 16:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem original enough to be copyrightable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The cover is not very original. In fact, it looks like some picture that a Soundcloud profile posted for a song they uploaded via their account. Despite that though, the cover is copyrighted, along with The Ocean's cover as well. These covers were displayed on big name companies such as Beatport^[1] and Spotify.^[2] Therefore I believe that deleting these files would be presumptuous with no doubt. Now there are reference links beside the words, "Beatport" and "Spotify." When you click on those links, you will be redirected to a page for the song Prisoner by Steve Angello on both Beatport and Spotify. There you will see that the imagery I display is also shared on those two websites; and you will ultimately see that the picture is indeed copyrighted and accurate. You must see the discussion page for The Ocean's cover to access the links for The Ocean's cover. Do do not delete the files. Thank you.

Infopage100, (talk, contributions) —Preceding undated comment added 11:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Infopage100:, I followed your links. I see evidence that this really is the cover, I don't believe this was in doubt. I do not see evidence that the cover is copyrighted. I believe that @Jo-Jo Eumerus: was suggesting that we could put a less restrictive license (such as {{PD-logo}}, likely with {{trademark}}) on the image which would allow someone to transfer the image to Wikimedia Commons where it could be used across projects. Do you have evidence that someone has a copyright on this cover? ★ Bigr Tex 18:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, two coloured boxes and short text does seem dubious in terms of meeting the treshold of originality, c.f File:Avenue of the Saints logo.svg for another image that was considered uncopyrightable by the US Copyright Office.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Desotokswatertower3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a crop of the image on http://www.desotoexplorer.com/news/2009/oct/21/council-instructs-wireless-providers-work-out-diff/ which shows no evidence of freeness. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cigarette Tax Per State.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 08:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cima, California.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Miniapolis 22:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 08:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like all images by that uploader contain that particular license formula, and they only come from two different machines according to the EXIF I analyzed. If we can trust the license statement, it seems like it's specific enough.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus, what do you make of their logs? Someone had left a note on the user's talk page asking them to clarify "photographer" years ago. Why do you think we can assume based on that? czar 16:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Releases all rights worldwide" is a specific enough license statement that I'd treat it as a plain license. The main question would be who is the photographer. I am not seeing evidence that it was taken from someone else - there are uploads in their history that were clearly marked as being by someone else, and these that contain the aforementioned license statement appear to have identical metadata. Thus I am not assuming that they just scraped images from other people. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CINE.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Resolution and file format argues that it was probably taken from the web. Kelly ^hi! 08:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:City tower, circular road junction.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 08:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Civil Ensign Flag of Kingdom of Montenegro.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused flag image. Kelly ^hi! 08:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Claim Jumper Restaurant.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 09:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clans01.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 18:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused GIF map of Japan. Also the following:

Kelly ^hi! 09:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seegene's official logo without background.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused company logo; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comparison of Seegene's DPO and conventional primer mismatch hybridization.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cheon Jong Yoon the CEO of Seegene.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catcher matched and mismatched.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hybridization of Seegene's DPO primer and Pitcher.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3D version of Seegene's DPO structure.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seegene's DPO structure in 2D.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart/promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seegene's TOCE quantitative analysis eg. HPV.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart/promotional image, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 09:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sawbuck diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has NC restriction, see Photo reuse section in source provided by uploader. FASTILY 09:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clark House 1888.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 16:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 1#File:Clark_House_1888.jpg

Delete - unused, doesn't have enough information on authorship and publication to determine PD status. Kelly ^hi! 12:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file name suggests that the file is from 1888, but we don't have any evidence that the file is from 1888. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The older version of the file is also published on http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2223-03862010000100012, where it says Clark House 1888 (Maritzburg College Archives). Unfortunately it's not clear what these archives are... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Compare with File:Clark House, Maritzburg College, 1888.jpg, another image of the same building which is actually used in the Maritzburg College article. It would seem strange to delete a high resolution image of the image as "unused" when it could easily be used to replace the tiny image currently in place in the article. --RexxS (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ClaWrite Alphabet.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 12:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused, no foreseeable use, {{PD-simple}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cleplaymidsummerdream1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 12:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clip of Orthographic Slovenia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused map. Kelly ^hi! 12:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clovis High School.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Majora (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 12:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on User:Jo-Jo Eumerus's evaluation above at [#File:Cima, California.JPG]. ★ Bigr Tex 21:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm skeptical. See the linked conversation above and note that many others by the same author were deleted with the same rationale (unclear who third-person "photographer" is) czar 16:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep short of any evidence to show it isn't theirs. It looks like the kind of snapshot someone would take, so it is a credible claim. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After three months I don't see a consensus to delete this image and the other image mentioned by Czar was closed as a keep. For those reasons, I'm going to close this as a keep and put to bed this FFD. --Majora (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of arms of the Holy See (present usage).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, redundant to File:Coat of arms Holy See.svg. Kelly ^hi! 12:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coats of Arms Unterfranken.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, missing evidence of permission. Kelly ^hi! 12:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it may fall under the scope of commons:Template:PD-Coa-Germany - the German Wikipedia page indicates that corporation governed by public law includes municipalities.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no evidence that this drawing was created by the government. See c:COM:COA#Copyright on the representation. Also, the copyright you linked to is based on an article in the copyright law which doesn't cover images according to c:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review, so the copyright tag seems to be invalid. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - File:Unterfranken Wappen.svg appears to exist as well and seems to be a better quality version, anyway. As for the image/text distinction, I notice that the page you link limits it to stamps and nothing else - Commons or German Wikipedia - I can see indicates such a distinction more generally than for stamps. The text of the ruling supports such a distinction, the text of the law less so.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coelophycian Presidential Seal.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 13:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Col Ralph "Doc" Eaton 82nd Airborne Division Chief of Staff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing authorship/publication information. Kelly ^hi! 13:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coldspot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 13:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colegiotermsofresidency.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear whether uploader is copyright holder of the depicted text. Kelly ^hi! 13:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coles Entrance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low-res. Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 13:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collage War in Afghanistan 2010.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Partially derivative of deleted file - see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taliban fighters hiding in a cave.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 13:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comet CY1975.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 14:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Commander - Australian Navy Cadets.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, obsoleted by File:5 CMDRANC WD SRI.png. Kelly ^hi! 16:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As the author, I agree it is now obsolete. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 01:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Commonwealth Star and Crux.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused flag image. Kelly ^hi! 16:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comparison of real GDP using BEA Deflator vs real GDP using Money Supply.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused graph. Kelly ^hi! 16:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ComploreLogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 16:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Concertchoirsingers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 16:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conference center interior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, quoted permission doesn't grant any specific license. Kelly ^hi! 16:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connecticut-college-arboretum-winter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 16:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clark1974.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: resolved czar 16:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence of permission. Also applies to derivative work File:Clark1974.svg. Kelly ^hi! 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created these files in 2009 as a replacements for a similar file by Gene Hobbs, File:Clark1974.jpg. The image consists of text (the effects of Oxygen toxicity) and lines that associate these effects visually. I created the images from the text in Clark's 1974 "The Toxicity of Oxygen". Either this is insufficient "sweat of the brow" to create a copyright, in which case they are in the public domain; or the creative work in making that arrangement of the text and lines is mine alone, and I've already released the files into the public domain. --RexxS (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The contributions by RexxS to the PNG file are ineligible for copyright. RexxS's SVG code is maybe copyrighted as computer software, but even if it is, the SVG code is licensed.

This image contains a lot of arrows and words. Is it possible to make these drawings differently by for example including different examples medical terms, or is there only one set of medical terms which must always be included? In the former case, then there could maybe be an arrangement copyright, but if it isn't possible to choose a different set of medical terms, then the PNG should be uncopyrightable. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know and given current medical understanding, the text is the comprehensive set of possible toxicities of oxygen in the human body. I have grouped together the effects by the principal sites used in its classification: lungs, eyes, central nervous system, and elsewhere at the cellular level. This forms part of the introduction to Oxygen toxicity #Classification, a Featured Article, so has survived considerable scrutiny by the community. The drawings could have various permutations of arrangement, but would essentially have to contain the same text. I don't know if that helps make a decision on whether copyright is possible, but I content that in either case, the question of "permission" does not arise and there are no grounds to damage the encyclopedia by deleting these files. --RexxS (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parkjnvbbk1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parkjnvbbk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, blurry/distorted, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr S. Ram, ex-principal of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Barabanki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:25tvollyball2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 22:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly a derivative of non-free content FASTILY 22:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fateofpollutantsinsoils.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a scan from a textbook, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 22:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoilpHDistributionPhosphorus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a scan from a textbook, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 22:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KA-27 PL.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low-res, possible copyvio (see watermark in bottom left corner) FASTILY 23:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Downtown in kiev.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (see watermark in upper right corner) FASTILY 23:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Havin' some FoP concerns too seeing as the Independence Monument, Kiev is fairly recent, c.f commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument of Independence (Kiev).Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beriev Be-12.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low-res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YeLePainting01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP for 2D works in Myanmar FASTILY 23:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YeLePainting02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP for 2D works in Myanmar FASTILY 23:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WomanandChildwithTanaka.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RogerClyne.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kadayawan5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:50, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Former main gate, Bukidnon State University.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, un-encyclopedic FASTILY 23:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KizKulesi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (appears to be a scan of a postcard or similar medium) FASTILY 23:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yesilkoyseaside.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (appears to be a scan of a postcard or similar medium) FASTILY 23:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MPSCloogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

University logo, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 23:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[1] ttps://www.beatport.com/release/prisoner-feat-gary-go/1658107

[2] ttps://open.spotify.com/album/1zYoZVSIJckWAYmQwNKu90

[1]

[2]