Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 3

< September 2	September 4 >

September 3

File:Japan prov map bingo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating the following for the same reason: Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SVG version looks fine to me. 1 for deletion. Willhsmit (talk) 03:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beta-thujone.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bow Falls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, relatively Low quality, source not stated (though probably self-made), we have better images already (e.g. File:Bow River-27527-3.jpg) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2004 us per 1000004.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20040610 smokestack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005 mexbowl standings.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005 nordrhein landtag result.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005 proof American Platinum Eagle reverse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005-12-18 N rajah 016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005epac.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005GulfHurricaines.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006 0422crabs0108 whitecr.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006 presidential polls.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006 US Energy Flow.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006 wagggs map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006.02E.NONAME peak.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006.02E.NONAME peak.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006CentralLibraryof1912.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 04E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 04L 5-day track.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 06 25 1300L Angora Fire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 08E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 10E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 11 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 12 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 13E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 14E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 14L 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 15 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007 15E 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 21W 5-day track.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 greece earthquake 10deg map 35N 25E 06JAN2008.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 hurricane season.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 Linconshire Earthquake.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 Market Rasen earthquake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 Sichuan Province earthquake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2009 TBS montage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2009Sep18 Rajiv Shah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2011AtlanticTropicalDepression12.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:202526W sm.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20mag.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 00:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sabatini-map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, copyright notice looks incompatible w PD release Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JML2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, appears to be a photo of a copyrighted sculpture (freedom of panorama wouldn't kick in - this is at an exhibition and not permanently installed) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tedgeoghegan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dando1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Law school graduation family shot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TerribleSpelling.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MaureenMcCormick.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gooselamphosteau.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alliin.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:L-alliin-2D-skeletal.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion. It's an old file that is no longer needed. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Retrograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not clear if this was taken from website or independently made Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robertbrownlow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mevalonic acid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Mevalonic-acid-2D-skeletal.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion. It's an old file that is no longer needed. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:C180 01-trumpet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not really clear that uploader took this photo (web-res but professional-looking) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holly mat1sm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3rdcore.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, looks like original research, uploader seems to have generally been disruptive (don't think this is a useful image) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Freebody circular.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Political Ideologies2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (doesn't appear to be any recognized schema for political ideologies) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Freebody object.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Normal and weight.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Normal and weight.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southern west virginia.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Southern WVA.PNG (though that one omits the pink-shaded counties, this could easily be recreated if it is ever needed) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samegame.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Platinum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tesseract.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, not really useful at explaining, this image does a better job Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bisexual.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Bi flag.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vigo county courthouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better images now at Vigo County Courthouse Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LunebergCompare2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not clear whether this would be useful, no stated source Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LunebergCompare.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not clear whether this would be useful, no stated source Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transparent3.5of5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plot.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plot small.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FloridaLighthouse.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, doubt uploader made clipart components of image Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was noted that it was supposed to be a temporary image when it was uploaded. Image description includes "temp image" and "will replace". No discussion is needed to delete; the template has used another image for several years now. Delete. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 11:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mensural notation lig 008.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uniform circular motion diagram 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Worms Luther Statue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have File:Martin Luther statue.jpg (among others) which is better Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uniform circular motion diagram 3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MNedostup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ms lewis copy.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bebhinn & Ronan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not particularly high-quality for generic dog images Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nothing.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:India Gate at night.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, we now have better images such as File:India Gate illuminated.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dimoffree.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Image-Dimoffree.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia-7thInfantryDivision.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by SVG, no source for photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PULSE1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diamondlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Typicaldebater.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debatejudge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VUS in Boston(compressed).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (related to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spacemanspif) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wintermoscow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Debatecoach.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pic2oy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Confucious Plaza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted statue (erected 1976[1]) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NOT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NOT Using NAND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OR Gate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OR Using NAND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NOR Using NAND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XNOR Using NAND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture Jonathan Kinloch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mustaqbal Urdu-Diwani.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AM251.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:AM2512d.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FumonisinB1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Fumonisin B1.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marthadog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low-quality for a random dog image Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OR Pinout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snimkaboyan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NOT Pinout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by PNG Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vinter2005 124.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, description is too vague for this file to ever be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joestarktapelarge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Progress Bar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dido Articles Progress Bar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pharma India 1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, out of date, should be text if anything Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PharmaIndia 3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, out of date, should be text if anything Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ancient alpahabet.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Ancient alphabet.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:D UEGPatch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spartanpresidents2006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:County Articles Progress Bar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1861aMonaLisa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sabariajay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pocket degu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WikiCHart.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have File:Elliott wave.svg which is better Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DegreeLabels.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hararbeer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photograph of copyrighted sculpture, freedom of panorama situation in ethiopia unclear (not listed at commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connecticut Highway 16.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unneeded, could recreate easily if needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canzuk99.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, encyclopedic value unclear Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canzuk998.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, encyclopedic value unclear Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portmoodyflag2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (not the flag of Port Moody) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evergreenlinestations.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this is claimed to be self-made, but the uploader is terrible and just tags everything gfdl even if things aren't his. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kelethnicorigin.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data, should be text Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port moody crime rate.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data, should be text Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port moody climate.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data, should be text Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port Moody lang demographics.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data, should be text Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port Moody demographics.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for data, should be text Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emerald Articles Progress Bar.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynne Griffin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not own work and is replaceable with free. Mt king ^(edits) 07:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mtking - as the uploader, I thank you for bringing this to my attention. You mention in the discussion line above that this is "replaceable with free." If I use the GNU Free Documentation License to license this photo, will I prevent this picture from being deleted? I initially used Creative Commons 3.0 share, and described it as "Own" only because I re-sized, recolored and recropped the original photo. Pls let me know if GNU Free license will suffice? Thank you again. LittleBrownWren (talk) 22:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)LittleBrownWren[reply]

I can answer that: sorry, no, that would not help, because you don't really own the copyright and your choice of license is rendered moot by that fact. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Tryptofish and Mtking, for educating me on this. I think I'm beginning to understand now. One last question: if I replaced this photo with a digital snapshot of the subject taken by myself at a recent fan convention (June 2011), in that case would I then be considered the appropriate copyright holder and use of the photo be permitted? Or would that be a COI, since in that case I (the copyright holder) would also be the uploader? Thanks for all your help. LittleBrownWren (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)LittleBrownWren[reply]

No COI at all. That would be the perfect solution. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trytofish, thank you very much. In that scenario what would be the most appropriate license for me to use? "Source" and "Author" would be "Own work" - but would it be CC-BY-SA? I want to make sure I license it properly so that there's no area of dispute. LittleBrownWren (talk) 19:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)LittleBrownWren[reply]

LittleBrownWren, you can license this photo however you wish (you still own the copyright to it). If you upload it under a compatible license in Wikipedia, then it can be used elsewhere. You can look here for a list of licenses which are compatible with WP goals, however, if these do not meet your desired goals, then contact me (or others) for assistance and we can steer you in the right direction. It is desirable to have multiple images as they can be used throughout WP, so just because we have one, it doesn't mean another image isn't appreciated. Have a good day! Buffs (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I may inquire, when was this photo taken? If it was 1989 or sooner, you might have a case to utilize {{PD-US-1989}}, however, there are quite a few hoops to jump through to get that used in that manner. Buffs (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Buffs. The original photo I uploaded was indeed taken prior to 1989 (1987 to be exact). However, I'm not certain it would quality for {{PD-US-1989}} since I'm not sure I could prove that a 'substantial number of copies were distributed publicly.' It sounds like the digital photo I took of the subject in June of this year (2011) would be much more suitable from a copyright perspective..? LittleBrownWren (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)LittleBrownWren[reply]

I'm sorry, but "substantial number of copies were distributed publicly" has nothing to do with the photo. Let me ask a few more questions. Where did you find/obtain this photo? A book? A pamphlet? A still handout? Is there a copyright notice on anything in the packet in which you obtained it? Look forward to your answer. Buffs (talk) 22:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Buffs - it was a promotional headshot of the subject which I purchased years ago from a moviegoods/movie memorabilia distributor in NYC. An 8x11 glossy. The kind that nowadays one might purchase at a convention for autographing. I then scanned the photo in to electronic format, and performed some basic image manipulation on it eg. cropping, toning it etc. As far as I can see, no copyright info indicated anywhere on the photo itself. To be clear, the shop I bought the headshot at (in the mid 1990s) was and is called Jerry Ohlinger's -- still in business today as far as I can tell -- moviematerials.com LittleBrownWren (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)LittleBrownWren[reply]

In such a case, you need to check with the records in the US copyright office. If it was never registered for a copyright with the US copyright office (and I didn't see anything on a cursory search), the photo is in the public domain due to failure to comply with required (copyright) formalities and should be labeled as {{PD-US-1989}}. Buffs (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In answer to the question to me, I'm inclined to agree with Buffs that the older picture can use the PD license, whereas the 2011 photo that you took yourself (a photo taken with your own camera, by you, not anything purchased and then scanned, in other words) would be CC-BY-SA. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Very likely PD unless someone can prove otherwise. Buffs (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Falco.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, too blurry to be of use. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

!? It is actually a rather good photograph of a fast moving bird. The background is blurred as it is a panning shot. The subject of the photograph is in reasonable focus considering the difficulty of photographing anything that is swooping at you :-). The only real problem is that the tip of one wing is cropped off. I had suggested it be moved to Commons so it could be used by other wikis, but it appears no one could be bothered, so I have done it myself. Had to give it another name as that filename was in use (perhaps that was why it wasn't moved) - now at File:NZ Falcon in flight.jpg. So go ahead and delete it, but please note the new location in the deletion log entry. --Tony Wills (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moot point since it has been moved to Commons, but I agree with Tony Wills that the image quality is actually rather good. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Father and Daughter Alaska Sea Fishing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fifth stellation of icosidodecahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fifteenth stellation of icosidodecahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zeroth stellation of dodecahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zeroth stellation of octahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zeroth stellation of icosahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First compound stellation of icosahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as below. --Avenue (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below Buffs (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Third stellation of icosahedron.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This output was generated using software that is "© Copyright 2000, 2001 V.Bulatov. Commercial use of these materials without prior written permission is prohibited." and is therefore -NC, and not free. Free version could be obtained easily. It is questionable if this could be called a 'basic geometric shape' for the purpose of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If no one else comments on this, please default to keep. I put the question out to some people and have two users telling me that the outputs would be non-free, one user telling me that the output would be free for anyone to licence how they please, and two users telling me that because the output is based off of a mathmatical formula, it's ineligible for copyright. I'll note that I'm getting the impression that most of these people don't have a tremendous amount of confidence in their statements, that it's not a clear cut issue. Since the parallel discussions on Commons are trending for Keep, we might as well keep these, and maybe send an email to the WMF legal staff. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The prohibition on "commercial use of these materials" seems to apply to the web site and associated software. Graphics generated by copyrighted software are not subject to the same copyright. Using Excel to draw a graph doesn't give Microsoft a copyright over the result, and using Photoshop to process photos doesn't give Adobe a copyright on the resulting image. The copyright holder (if any) would be the person running the software, i.e. the uploader. --Avenue (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. I think that Avenue's analysis is correct. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep To attain copyright, by defintion, requires a HUMAN creator, not a non-human as defined by the Supreme Court principles set forth in Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. and Feist v. Rural. As example, this painting is ineligible for copyright since it wasn't created by a human. For copyright concerns, it is also important to note that facts are not copyrightable. The person who created it used a tool (in this case, software) to create the image, but that copyright doesn't transfer to the owner of the tool; Sears doesn't somehow attain copyright of the children's playset I built just because I used a Craftman screwdriver. Buffs (talk) 06:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I uploaded the images from the applet. I contacted V.Bulatov for permission on the whole set of images, linked the Template:Bulatov_polyhedra_stellations_applet and he replied below. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From: "Vladimir Bulatov" <[email protected]>
To: "Tom Ruen" 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: Wikipedia images from Polyhedra Stellations Applet

> Hello Tom,
>   I am OK with that template.
> 
> All the best, Vladimir

Withdrawn Resolved by OTRS ticket 2011090410008681. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corton village hall sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cowasaur.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abclocalradio.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of the usages in any of these articles are required. These are articles of stations of a radio network, but the logo of the radio network isn't needed in any of them, if at all, the logo of the radio station. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:United States Auto Club logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is used in all season articles, but it's not necessary there to understand the subject. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Train Express Régional (SNCF).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image does nothing to illustrate the article subject, used solely decorative. The Evil IP address (talk) 16:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image not eligible for copyright. Buffs (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:DECORATIVE is not a good argument for deletion nomination. Although it does appear to be eligible for trademark (maybe?), and thus is non-free (so that the license on the file description page is probably incorrect: not simply a font, but (if I'm correct) a corporate logo), as a corporate logo, it passes WP:NFCC#2, which would be the concern here. We generally allow corporate logos to appear on pages about those companies, because these logos are intended by their owners to be widely distributed. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Re:"Although it does appear to be eligible for trademark, and thus is non-free" Please read {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademarked}}. Our issue is copyright infringement, not trademark restriction of public domain images. PD images can still exist with restriction. Examples of these include patents and trademarks. Buffs (talk) 06:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that it matters what those templates say. I have to admit that I'm far from being an intellectual property lawyer, so I don't claim to understand the legal niceties. However, the nomination, to which I was responding, never mentioned these things, and only said that the image was being used decoratively. My argument is that reproduction of a putative logo (assuming that it really is their logo—perhaps Sven is correct, below, that it is only a trivial font representation thereof) does not infringe copyright, and I don't think that you disagree with that. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect. If an image is copyrighted, it is copyrighted, period. Any use of a copyrighted image outside their permission is a violation of that copyright except those allowed by fair use. In the case of this image, it is ineligible for copyright since it consists solely of text. Letters and/or words/short phrases alone cannot attain copyright. The same goes for geometric and simple shapes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buffs (talk • contribs) 17:10, September 4, 2011

Extended content

NFL abandoned its copyright claims on the fleur-de-lis (news report)
DUB Magazine (authority)
Nikken USA Inc. (authority)
Bruce Lee core symbol (authority)
New York Arrows logo (case report}
Car Credit City logo: court rules that this logo was derivative of an older copyrighted logo (authority)
Symbols for "Myst" (authority)
Letter S (authority)
Registration refused (authority)
Ets-Hokin v Skyy Spirits Inc
photo is protected, but not the bottle
addition of shading, colors, labels to a free black and white outline map (case report)

I think we actually agree that it should be kept? --Tryptofish (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. But I felt it was important to explain why it should have been kept. Buffs (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree with Tryptofish. It's simple cursive text, so I would say that it is in fact PD-Textlogo. I removed the wall of FURs before seeing his post, by the way. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:University of Nebraska Logo 1992-2003.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of these usages are required, image used solely decorative. The Evil IP address (talk) 16:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image is free of copyright and is permitted to be used in a decorative manner. Buffs (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is rather on the boarderline, but I think that it does not qualify for PD-textlogo status. It is therefore a much overused non-free file. Since it does not meet NFCC#8 it should be deleted. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Woah there. Why is it on the border? This very image was brought up in discussion several times during the "great college logo debate of 2009" no less than 15 people weighed in on it and it was decided to be free of copyright. Creative arrangement of letters does not attain copyright, but can attain trademark. Buffs (talk) 05:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Short version:a small amount of text alone CANNOT attain copyright (i.e. slogans, logos, etc). Buffs (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you argue against what Sven said about NFCC#8? It really isn't just text, but letters as part of an image. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
NFCC#8 applies to non-free images, not free ones. The basic question to ask yourself is are the letters used to show letters (their intended function) or merely as a medium to show creativity in something larger (like a book). The idea behind copyright is that it protects creative works, not the means by which to create works. A headlight on a car cannot be copyrighted. It is a functional piece. The same goes for a lightbulb. Either one (at inception) could be patented for creative ways to make the object, but not the objects themselves. In short, you cannot separate form from function in this instance (they are letters intended to be used in their functional form as letters).

As to your concern about trademark, indeed they DO have a financial interest in protecting their trademark. Trademarked images do not have the same protections as copyrighted images. Trademarked images are hosted on Commons galore (see above) and we already have a general disclaimer regarding their use both here and outside Wikipedia. Buffs (talk) For the use on Wikipedia, trademarks (that are ineligible for copyright) are considered free images. 17:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, I'm no lawyer, so I'll defer these points to the closing admin. For what it's worth, the file description page currently has it labeled as non-free. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. It is labeled as {{trademarked}} and {{PD-textlogo}}. It has Non-free use rationales, but the image itself is labeled appropriately. Fixing that now. Buffs (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done Buffs (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#2, because it is subject to licensing by the owner. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't require licensing for a number of reasons. The problem is that people here do not understand copyright law. Even if there are licensing restrictions, they are independent of usage as a free image under trademark. please read {{trademark}}. Buffs (talk) 05:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just re-read NFCC#2 and this image in NO way is "used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role". Furthermore, this statement applies to non-free images. This image (as it is already labeled) is NOT a non-free image. Your argument is, therefore, without merit. Buffs (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've read it. It seems to me that the university in question has a commercial interest in selling merchandise with the logo on it. Most universities do marketing that way. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
see above (keep the conversation in one place). Buffs (talk) 17:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nswrl 1988.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Besides missing rationales, the image is used solely decorative, does nothing to illustrate the article subject. The Evil IP address (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale exists only for the NSWRL article, from which the image was removed and replaced with the latest logo. I have restored it though.--Jeff79 (talk) 00:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wonder if this image is {{PD-US-1989}} since it was initially used within that timeframe and I don't see a copyright. Buffs (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wentletrap 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image is released under a non-commercial license, and therefore is neither free use, nor the own work of the uploader. From the website listed as the source: "Permission to use and reproduce images from NC Sea Shells is freely granted for non-profit instructional and educational purposes, with acknowledgement of photo source left intact." Sven Manguard Wha? 16:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rajwinder.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Used only on a long gone user's talk page without context. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThanksFromBoston.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic. Perhaps intended to be a personal thank you image, but the uploader is long gone. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:25, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: unencyclopedic. Rwendland (talk) 20:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:State of Palestine recognition.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Product of a redundant proposal (here and here) of an inactive user. Nightw 17:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: redundant and out of date. Rwendland (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SoP recognition and PLO relations.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Product of a redundant proposal (here and here) of an inactive user. Nightw 17:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:United State of Israel-Palestine Diplomacy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated, inaccurate and superseded by the much-better-updated and higher-quality File:Israel-Palestine Diplomacy.svg Nightw 18:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: old file that is no longer needed. Rwendland (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:State of Palestine explicit recognition per official sources.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Product of a redundant proposal of an inactive user. Orphaned. Nightw 18:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Palestine recognition.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated, orphaned, duplicate of File:Palestine-recognition-map.png. Nightw 18:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mac sleeping.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image, unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:050720 rpts.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:050921 Sen.Barack Obama Podcast 3.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:050928 Sen.Barack Obama Podcast 4.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:051005 Sen.Barack Obama Podcast 5.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:051019 Sen.Barack Obama Podcast 7.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:052405afghan road2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:060923-O-0000X-003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:082007 5daysm.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:09-12-07-huminski-pos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, No foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASKKATYOneSheet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, questionable copyright status. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.