Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Taj Mahal in March 2004

The Taj Mahal

Used in many articles, including India and Taj Mahal. FP image from the Commons. It really has striking colors, highlighting how nice the Taj Mahal looks. --AllyUnion (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate and support. - AllyUnion (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very famous image: perhaps featured pictures should be about bringing new images to light? Jdhowens90 10:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The criteria don't mention anything about that. It illustrates the article well, and is certainly striking. Support. Raven4x4x 08:35, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  - I do agree with Jdhowens90; It seems rather cliche. -Haon 12:44, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes, perfect. Thanks for the reminder, time for a vindaloo. :) --Deglr6328 02:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. James F. (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Beautiful. Enochlau 13:06, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Asport. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:14
Support -- TomStar81 22:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as cliché as it may be. It's a stunning image that adds lots to the Taj Mahal article. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:06, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
Support. cliché--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 04:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good image, does it's job perfectly --Fir0002 07:35, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
Support. I think Taj Mahal Badalandabad from Van Wilder would vote support too. - Darwinek 11:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - MPF 16:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - have seen similar pictures by the dozends, but I am still very impressed by the building. -- Chris 73 Talk 07:41, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support, despite the fact that there are probably hundreds of uploaded picture of the Taj Mahal this is a great photo and works well in the article. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 19:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
Neutral Well taken, but me & every other visitor has this exact photo, maybe a photo that captures it in a different way. I dont know how you can photograph this any other way, but I'd like to see it done. --User:Rakkar
Support =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Off-centre. Mark ¹ 03:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Would support if the view had been from the centre. --Rebroad 17:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support- beautiful. As some people think of the assymetricality (if that's not a word, it should be) as a bad thing, I think that is what makes the picture great. Hojimachong 02:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Taj Mahal in March 2004.jpg ~ Veledan • Talk ^new 00:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]