Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/Archive 6

< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement | Nominations | Archives
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Northamerica1000
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Artist's impression

  Artist's impression – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per its overall significance and the article's reliance on a single source. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – A rather niche topic; the article may not actually be improved much. North America1000 17:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Catchiness

  Catchiness – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per its overall significance and only being Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 19:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
    Neutral – was previously a TAFI collaboration in early May 2013, but did not receive much in terms of significant improvements. The topic may not interest a great deal of editors, and the article may not actually be improved much. North America1000 00:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Comment @Northamerica1000: If I remember correctly, Catchiness was previous a TAFI during the period when 7 or 10 articles were chosen per week, which severely diluted the effectiveness of the TAFI project because people were no longer guided towards one article over the week. During that period, contributions slumped across the board.--Coin945 (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
    • @Coin945: Thanks for the input, and nice to hear from you. I'll retain my "neutral" for the time being, though. I'm not convinced that the topic will attract a great deal of improvements. However, I'm not opposing. North America1000 04:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Upon further consideration, opposing, per my comment above (part of which has been struck). North America1000 17:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (1985)

  Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego? (1985) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

The original, iconic, Carmen Sandiego game.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per page view stats, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – A dated video game from 1985; may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question, rather than from a diverse group of editors. North America1000 19:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Just Do It

  Just Do It – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 350 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per page view stats and cultural significance, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – A well known corporate trademark and slogan, but Nike makes more than enough money; doesn't need our efforts to help improve their market share in shoes and apparel. See also: Nike sweatshops (nominated below) and Sweatshop. North America1000 17:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Geo-literacy

  Geo-literacy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Oppose per low page view stats, also already C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:03, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose – Low page views, not of enough interest to many people. North America1000 19:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Graffiti in Russia

  Graffiti in Russia – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per page view stats, also only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Avalon explosion

  Avalon explosion – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support as is only Stub class: potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose low page views. North America1000 20:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Throw the cat among the pigeons

  Throw the cat among the pigeons – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 40 daily hits

Interesting topic.--Coin945 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support as is only Start class, potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Rather niche, being an idiom. I doubt this will actually attract many editors for significant improvements. Lowish to moderate overall page views. North America1000 17:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Dog–cat relationship

  Dog–cat relationship – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 95 daily hits

  1. Support - already OK article. But can be expanded.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support as is only Stub class: also has significant page view stats. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Dominant response

  Dominant response – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

  1. Support Stub with potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose – Niche topic with low page views. North America1000 18:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support – potential for expansion is there.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Holiness of Palestine

  Holiness of Palestine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

  1. Oppose I would suggest leaving TAFI until after the merger has taken place. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose - very low page views. North America1000 20:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Driving etiquette

  Driving etiquette – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 35 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose: Does not appear to be much potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support - high on importance topic even to the general public. Donnie Park (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose – "Interesting article" and "support per nom" rationales don't convince me to support. Not sure this would actually be improved much over the course of a week. North America1000 18:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

What's done is done

  What's done is done – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

  1. Support as is only Start class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – It's an expression, but I'm not sure that this would need an entire week for improvements; this may not actually be improved much as per the topic's limited scope and actual potential for expansion. North America1000 17:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Word recognition

  Word recognition – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 75 daily hits

  1. Support per overall significance, also needs cleanup. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Already fairly developed. North America1000 18:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Tetris (Electronic Arts)

  Tetris (Electronic Arts) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 120 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support Very minimal article at present. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – May only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kinect Adventures!

  Kinect Adventures! – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 55 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per nom, high page view stats and Mid Importance in WikiProject Video games. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – As of this post, it has only received six edits for all of 2015 (Revision history). I'm unconvinced that a lot of people will jump in to rapidly improve this article. North America1000 18:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Distraction-conflict

  Distraction-conflict – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 20 daily hits

  1. Oppose per low page view stats, doesn't appear to be much potential for expansion. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose – Interesting topic, but may not attract many editors for actual improvements per the topic's overall specialized focus vis-à-vis social psychology. North America1000 17:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Flight Control (video game)

  Flight Control (video game) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support Start class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Brain Challenge

  Brain Challenge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 30 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support: C class, potential for improvement, has also failed 2 Good Article nominations. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – may only interest a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. North America1000 20:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Illinois Fighting Illini football

  Illinois Fighting Illini football – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 12,766 in last 30 days daily hits

  1. Support per the high page view stats, only being Stub class and its High importance in WikiProject College Football. --Rubbish computer 16:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - high number of views.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 01:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nike sweatshops

  Nike sweatshops – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 267 daily hits

  1. support – per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 23:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

  Approved. North America1000 01:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Price ceiling

  Price ceiling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 199 daily hits

  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Oppose - Already fairly developed, although it does receive a lot of page views. North America1000 22:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  5. Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

{{Approved}}. North America1000 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Retractable pen

  Retractable pen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 50 daily hits

  1. Support Due to the subject's overall significance, currently only C class but being checked for B criteria. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – It's unclear if this article will actually receive much in terms of improvement, because it is a rather niche, narrow topic and the article seems to cover most aspects of it. North America1000 01:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
  4. Support – {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  5. Support - seems like it could reasonably be improved.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 01:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

{{Approved}}. North America1000 12:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Delicatessen

  Delicatessen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 305 daily hits

 
An Italian delicatessen in Rome
  1. Support - also because of the unclear article flow. Also needs more images. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support – per nom. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 23:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

{{approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

  1. Oppose - I also know it but don't think it'd interest anyone and would quite honestly waste a week when a better subject could be picked and improved . –Davey2010Talk 13:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

{{Unapproved}}. North America1000 20:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Izakaya

 
People at an izakaya

  Izakaya – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support per nom. –Davey2010Talk 13:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

{{Approved}}. North America1000 20:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Vandal Kingdom

  Vandal Kingdom – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • An interesting historical kingdom from one of the most elusive periods. The article itself needs a lot of help and could use fixing, translations, images, and additions as well as copyediting and such.--Sige |д･) 06:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  1. support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. support per nom. –Davey2010Talk 12:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

{{Approved}}. North America1000 20:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Reader Rabbit

  Reader Rabbit – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 110 daily hits

Sad article for iconic edutainment series.--Coin945 (talk) 16:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support The article has only one source! Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 03:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
    Oppose per only Low importance in its respective WikiProjects. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 22:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
    Comment @Rubbish computer:, the article's importance was incorrectly rated. I re-rated it as medium and high according to the Wikiproject.--Coin945 (talk) 05:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per above points and high page view stats. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 11:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Not finding many sources that are about the topic. There's a few usable ones, but it's not very extensive.
    – Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
    – North America1000 05:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
    Well, just find some more. Two sources is much better than one, three sources is better than two, but adding one extra source from an article with hundreds of citations is not such a huge difference (other than verification of a certain statement). Here, we need more citations for proving the article is notable and is of any value. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
    In this case, this article is notable, but not proved well enough. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Support - per every supporting point. Yes, many people know Reader Rabbit, yet it appears very in-universe. Needs more sources describing Reader Rabbits reception, development, etc. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
  5. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

  Approved Looks like it is 3 net supports. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Swap body

Swap body – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – A topic of fairly limited scope about a type of freight container; may not receive a week's worth of research and improvements. North America1000 22:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Northamerica1000. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Tilt tray sorter

Tilt tray sorter – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom.--Coin945 (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Limited scope; a conveyor belt that sorts things. Unlikely to receive a week's worth of research and improvements. North America1000 22:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Northamerica1000. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Cultural sensibility

  Cultural sensibility – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 15 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose – Low page views, quite niche as per the topic's specialized focus upon socioculture relative to psychology, and vice versa. May not attract many editors; may not be improved much. North America1000 17:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose per Northamerica1000. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Nintendogs

  Nintendogs – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per nom, also only C class. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – Already in a developed state; may not receive significant improvements. North America1000 18:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - as per Northamerica1000. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Doodle Jump

  Doodle Jump – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 70 daily hits

One of the best-selling video games of all time.--Coin945 (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support: C class, potential for improvement. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose – May not actually be improved much. How much is actually written about this game in reliable sources? From a cursory search, many sources only provide passing mentions. North America1000 18:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - just as Northamerica1000 says, reliable sources are not the main TAFI intention. I would much prefer improvement of the actual article content, rather than just source improvement. Source improvement is only complementary. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Retail geography

  Retail geography – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

– Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Oppose per low page view stats. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Philip Emeagwali

  Philip Emeagwali – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 87 daily hits

  1. support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose unsure as to overall significance. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

List of currencies in Oceania

  List of currencies in Oceania – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - N/A daily hits

The list exists for every other continent except Oceania. The African article is Top-rated importance.--Coin945 (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

  1. Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    Support – Makes sense to have a complete encyclopedia. North America1000 04:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  2. Neutral – Not supporting or opposing at this time. The content already exists in similar format compared to other list articles at Economy of Oceania, which includes a list. I'm not sure if this would be of strong interest to diverse editors over the course of a week. The list is already developed, so it just needs a few paragraphs summarizing the content of the list. Struck my initial !vote above. North America1000 01:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  3. Absolute support - because Wikipedia should not be fully Euro-biased or US-biased. Oceania is needed too. Well, we just need to get started with this article before we continue thinking about anything. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Monopsony

  Monopsony – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Oppose – A bit of a specialized and technical topic; the article is already well-developed. It may not actually be improved much by this project. North America1000 22:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Northamerica1000. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Business alliance

  Business alliance – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 45 daily hits

  1. Support - per nomination.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs)
  3. Oppose – A simple topic about a business term. Would this actually be improved much? It seems that it's already defined in the article, so it's likely that expansion would involve documenting various business alliances that exist. E.g. "Company A has an alliance with company B, here's what it entails". North America1000 22:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Northamerica1000. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

  Not approved. No further input after 21 days. North America1000 15:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/Archive_6&oldid=1138375187"