Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XMLmind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XMLmind

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. PROD declined by page author. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete - as above, also appears to have been blanked by creator Deunanknute (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – This seems to be one of the most popular editors for the Docbook format. Which may be minor unless you're a technical writer. But this editor and Docbook are what O'Reilly use to publish their programming language books, the famous ones with animals on the covers. In my mind, that alone makes it notable. There were also the following hits on the web: [1] [2][3][4][5] [6]
And a couple of mentions (recommendations) in Books: [7] [8]
To me this looks like plenty of material for an article. Enough to meet WP:NSOFT. It's from a small software company in France and is still being developed, with the last upgrade last month. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 13:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.