Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.ultimate-anonymity.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by Lectonar. MER-C 09:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Www.ultimate-anonymity.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
this article is blatant advt for a company. the afd tag has been removed due to Bad faith Mugunth 06:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G11. Article creator has a history of making ad pages and is even spamming external links of this site to other articles. No notability even asserted. Spellcast 07:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speede delete. Even if the ad part is overlooked, it still qualifies for speedy as there is absolutely no notability asserted. --soum talk 08:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete. Page was re-created after previous nom (above), hence the double nomination. Page already deleted by: User:NawlinWiki. Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 15:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Www.ultimate-anonymity.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article seems to be of a non-notable company. The speedy deletion tag has been contested so I've just decided to nominate it for AFD. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ad. JJL 13:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I am sure that the Speedy would have stuck. NN. - Rjd0060 13:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why are there four separate AfDs for this article on today's log.......? ChrisTheDude 14:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Seems to have been deleted already ffm 14:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.