Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Thomas Putt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Manor of Gittisham#Putt. czar 20:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Thomas Putt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes no claim of notability, and the subject does not meet WP:GNG. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 02:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable in the context of British social history as the squire of a 4,000 acre estate and owner a major English country house redesigned by Sir John Soane. There are good inline citations and the article brings useful additional detail to the associated Wikipedia articles.Fuseemusee (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Manor of Gittisham#Putt, which currently has one line on the subject. Part of the present article is on his older brother, who is covered more fully there. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Manor of Gittisham#Putt as there is not much here solely about the deeds of this particular Putt so does not seem independently notable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.