Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Seebring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Seebring

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Also, the editor who created the article may have a conflict of interest. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: With no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, the author does not meet the criteria of notability for people. There is also no evidence that the author meets the additional criteria for creative professionals to presume that an article about him is needed. Jfgslo (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I think we have normally regarded writing a poem or story or play included in an anthology as notability. It shows recognition of importance by a responsible editorial group. DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.