Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WavePad (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- WavePad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
OK, I'm trying to follow the byzantine instructions to raise an AfD again for this advertisement of a non notable commercial product WavePad. Greglocock (talk) 02:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the problem with this article as I see it is that the software itself is a commercial product, and the article does not establish notability, and is basically just an ad for the software. It does have google hits, it is a real product, but none of the hits I saw were reviews or articles on WP:RS websites. (sorry this is my first AfD and I have screwed it up one way and another). Greglocock (talk) 04:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There are very few hits for this software, and most of those are only for downloading the product. It appears that this does not meet notability. Looking at the original poster, and the history of this article, this appears to be an advertisemt. -- Pax85 (talk) 07:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet notability criteria (WP:N) - lacks reputable 3rd party references to establish notability of the software. Dialectric (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For all the reasons said. Miami33139 (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree that since this is a commercial product, it needs to establish notability beyond "it exists". As it stands it's nothing more than an advert for the company that sells it. §FreeRangeFrog 00:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.