Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang "Banana" Jiao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to NewBee. Anyone wanting to merge should obviously discuss on tp (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wang "Banana" Jiao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Protect and merge to NewBee, no independant coverage outside of that. Vaypertrail (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect no independent coverage for this individual in a video game reliable sources custom Google search or Daily Dot—redirection to their parent team as a useful search term should be obvious. No protection necessary as long as this AfD's consensus is enforced. – czar 14:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 20:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete/Redirect Held the top spot for all time esports earnings for several months. A fact which is reported by reliable sources which in theory would mean he should have received significant coverage, but this is the closest I found. I believe the significant coverage may be found in Chinese language sources but my attempts to find them using google translate have proven fruitless. I am open to changing my mind if someone can find good foreign language sources. Winner 42 Talk to me! 03:48, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - per Czar and nom. Lack of dedicated coverage. Sergecross73 msg me 14:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.