Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitalijs Pavelko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Vitalijs Pavelko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Vitalijs Pavelko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see how he passes WP:NSCHOLAR, and not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Citability in GScholar is quite low, with h-index of around 5. Nothing else indicates passing WP:PROF on other grounds. The article is full of unsourced WP:OR and is highly promotional, a borderline G11 case. Nsk92 (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability not evident from the article, fails WP:NSCHOLAR. --hroest 02:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delete, only evidence of WP:PROF notability is the "honored worker" award and I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.