Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visuals (project)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visuals (project)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article seems to fail WP:N and WP:RS: the only third-party RS provided is Bild (and yet it receives criticism for its dubious journalistic standards). All the other sources are Ukrainian media of questionable reliability, and most of them do not mention "Visuals" at all, only using infographics from it. --Buzz105 (talk) 10:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. New source from Wikimedia Ukraine added. --Dctrzl (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
extra new source. --Dctrzl (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Such a number of ″questionable reliability″ sources (Wikimedia Ukraine, Ukrainian Independent Information Agency,Hromadske.TV, Ukrayinska Pravda, The Ukrainian Week, Bild, etc.) is sufficient to describe the project? --Dctrzl (talk) 19:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.