Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ciutacu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Ciutacu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not evident. Only sources provided are a search at his own newspaper and his personal blog. Google Web search gives lots of hits, but they seem to be self-published or directory entries. News search returns mostly hits from his own paper, but admittedly I have a hard time assessing the Romanian hits. Favonian (talk) 19:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 19:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 19:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - senior position at a major newspaper and host of a political show on a major TV channel are a first indication of notability. Has been profiled by a magazine, and not only has a biography on the TV station's site, but also was given an extensive interview by his newspaper, something they certainly don't do for all their employees. Was involved in a heavily covered lawsuit, is regularly quoted on various subjects, is attacked by both the Prime Minister and the President of Romania for aggressive questioning, etc. It's not much of an article at present, and I'm not sure that Vorbe Grele needs a separate article, but the man himself is fairly notable. - Biruitorul ^Talk 21:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Biruitorul; complete stub of an article at the moment but the subject seems to be indisputably notable. ~ mazca ^talk 22:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. - Mark as a stub. Carrite (talk) 22:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Biruitorul; all Romanian language sources he presented are reliable and establish notability per WP rules.Anonimu (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep and close. Established notability in Romania is perfectly acceptable to en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.