Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unish (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced advert for a non-notable conlang. KMF (talk) 03:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I can't find any independent sources for this. --Hirsutism (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Considerable number of scholarly sources discuss this artificially developed language.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and many more. Lourdes 12:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would strongly like to keep this page. "Unish" is one of the few constructed/artificial languages. It is also known to be researched and refined constantly by a language development team in Sejong University. I believe it is worthwile to keep this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.214.183.214 (talk) 12:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Lourdes 77.179.112.138 (talk) 19:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.