Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripurari Swami (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tripurari Swami

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am having doubts this person meets WP:NBIO (WP:NAUTHOR?). I am not seeing WP:SIGCOV coverage of his life, just some mentions in passing, and many sources don't look very reliable. AfD from 2010 had arguments that some of his works have been reviewed by reliable sources (assuming Yoga Journal is reliable...), but WP:NOTINHERITED. Maybe some of his works are notable if they have been reviewed and meet WP:NBOOK, but that doesn't mean the author is notable too. On a side note, if this is kept, we need to deal with promotional language ("Over the years that followed, Prabhupada showered Tripurari with affection and repeatedly expressed his appreciation for Tripurari's selfless service and ability to inspire others", etc.). Fixing neutrality issues is a surmountable problem, but can we deal with the likely lack of notability (SIGCOV)? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, and United States of America. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PROMO for this individual, nothing notable found in RS that I can see. Oaktree b (talk) 22:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.