Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trebava Osiječani
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pigman☿ 06:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Trebava Osiječani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
horribly biased, hasn't been changed since beginning of november, has no real information. google brings up 43 total pages, 9 of them english, and not a one of the english being notable. Sudoku424 (talk) 03:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability, no sources, nonsensical. JJL (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Hoax. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like a hoax. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax, possibly G1 nonsense speedy delete.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Not a hoax - a vandalized substub on a team that genuinely plays in the second division of the Republic of Srpska (that is, the Serbian bit of Bosnia-Hercegovina). My guess is that that doesn't amount to notability, but since I don't follow the football at all, I can't have a firm opinion about the Srpska second division. --Paularblaster (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.