Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treasure Detectives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Treasure Detectives

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source. No further sourcing found. Prod contested without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I did a deeper search on Google news, and saw a few possible sources, but not enough, I think, for WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as well as the Forbes piece referenced in the article there is coverage at Hollywood Reporter, Belfast Telegraph,Slate, and there is a review in The New York Daily News but I can't access it from Europe. There is enough coverage for WP:GNG so deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'd go keep on this one, as per User:Atlantic306 - Forbes isn't any use as it's their 'sites', so is user generated, but there are reviews here and coverage from Slate and Metro just about inch us over the bar, IMHO... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources listed above, poor WP:BEFORE was done. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.