Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trackheadz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trackheadz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC, search of references on Google do not show any recent reliable articles. In addition, the references in the article does not seem to be independent from the subject. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I myself would've pursued deletion also if it wasn't that someone else apparently reviewed this, there's nothing at all for any actual convincing notability and the sources are certainly not better; my searches also found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 21:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable. Tom29739 ^[talk] 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.