Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torijutsu (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. as hoax Ed (talk • majestic titan) 08:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Torijutsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not notable by any means. No reliable sources on this topic. Seems to use facebook and forum posts as a scholarly references. Fails to meet WP:GNG. Odie5533 (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete This appears to be a blatant hoax article, and the sources that are cited are either dubious or have no direct bearing on the topic. Fails notability per nominator when the sources are fully examined. Triona (talk) 07:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy as A7 and tagged. No indication of importance. No verifiable, reliable sources. Aditya Ex Machina 07:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- * Additional information The prior nom was rendered moot by a db-owner before consensus could be reached. Triona (talk) 07:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.