Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomorrow is the Another Day
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge/redirect the content to No Regret Life. Since there doesn't seem to be anything to merge, though, I'll simply redirect the article leaving the history visible. --jonny-mt 04:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tomorrow is the Another Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lacks notability per WP:MUSIC. Fleetflame 03:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete is the Article. No reliable sources for this album; fails WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: where are the references? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 04:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgive me if I'm not doing things right as I'm new here. However, I do not see why this article merits deletion for two reasons. First, given that No Regret Life has separate articles for their second and third albums, I do not see why their first cannot. Second, No Regret Life has performed an ending theme for the popular anime Naruto, which satisfies section 10 of WP:MUSIC. As for sources, I do not see the need to cite the album itself as a source. I am open to suggestions on how to improve this article. - Aurum auriga —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurum auriga (talk • contribs) 04:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Section ten of WP:MUSIC reads, "But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article." Yes, the band's other two albums have articles, but they haven't been around long and shouldn't be here--they probably just got overlooked. I would put any information relevant to this album in No Regret Life. Fleetflame 04:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In the case that the separate articles on the other two albums are to be questioned as well, then I would agree on the deletion. The only reason I created the article in the first place was because of the existence of the other articles, so if you say that they shouldn't exist in the first place I see no reason for my article to remain as is. I would be more than willing to incorporate the content in the separate articles on the main one. - Aurum Auriga —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurum auriga (talk • contribs) 04:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Section ten of WP:MUSIC reads, "But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article." Yes, the band's other two albums have articles, but they haven't been around long and shouldn't be here--they probably just got overlooked. I would put any information relevant to this album in No Regret Life. Fleetflame 04:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all their albums into No Regret Life article. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've merged the other two album articles into No Regret Life. Fleetflame 00:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect all their albums to No Regret Life. --DAJF (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect - per WP:BEFORE. - Neier (talk) 13:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. May I just say that I love the title. If you do too, you might be interested in Kanemura Osamu's book Happiness is a Red before Exploding. The (B/W) photographs in it are pretty good too. -- Hoary (talk) 15:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.