Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titcoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Titcoin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, primary and unreliable sources Retimuko (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A brief look at the sources shows CNN, Vice, Playboy, Men's Health. These are not primary sources... Greenman (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you looked at the CNN article? It has nothing to do with Titcoin. Retimuko (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - CNN text and video doesn't mention this topic, no. but... Widefox; talk 00:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there's Vice, Playboy and others go into detail so seems at least a weak keep based on passing WP:GNG. Widefox; talk 00:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep It has received SIGCOV in RS, though it is somewhat comical commentary rather than serious coverage of a legitimate cryptocurrency. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Bustle, Vice, Cosmopolitan, The Daily Dot, Men's Health and Playboy provide significant coverage. An article instead on Cryptocurrencies in the adult entertainment industry would suffice, but Titcoin seems to easily be the one with the most coverage. The fact that the coverage is designed to be comedic does not negate the notability of the topic, nor does the distastefulness of the subject. — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 00:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.