Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thin Ice (2020 TV series)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Techincally, this is a WP:SNOW keep and a withdrawal. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thin Ice (2020 TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced stub on a TV show. PROD concern was:
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021
— User:Donaldd23 17:13, 23 October 2023
DePRODded by Necrothesp (talk · contribs) at 15:27, 24 October 2023 with no explanation except, take to AfD
. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, France, Iceland, and Sweden. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Passes W:GNG with coverage such as these [1][2][3] Alvaldi (talk) 16:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- It has also got plenty of english sources, such as [4][5]. I'v addied them all to the article. @LaundryPizza03, would you consider withdrawing the nomination? Alvaldi (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Per WP:SK#3, we would have to wait until a WP:SNOW closure is possible. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. On a sidenote, there is also coverage in the Swedish media such as [6][7]. Alvaldi (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Per WP:SK#3, we would have to wait until a WP:SNOW closure is possible. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- It has also got plenty of english sources, such as [4][5]. I'v addied them all to the article. @LaundryPizza03, would you consider withdrawing the nomination? Alvaldi (talk) 16:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- weak keep. When I created it it looked like it would be more than a single season and a good example of something not anglocentric. I'm not greatly bothered about it other than as an inclusionist. --AlisonW (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep clearly notable after references added by @Alvaldi who has performed a real WP:HEYMAN.
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Its improvement illustrates perfectly the weakness of the prodding system. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Per improvements made after nom. per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 22:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.