Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Week Thus Far (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 05:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

The Week Thus Far

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/The Week Thus Far
• Articles for deletion/The Week Thus Far (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/The Week Thus Far (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Week Thus Far (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized article about a community channel (the Canadian equivalent of public access television) television show, not reliably sourced well enough to pass WP:TVSHOW. As always, every television show is not automatically guaranteed a Wikipedia article just because it's technically possible to verify that it existed -- but the only sources here are three short blurbs from a commuter daily and alt-weeklies in the same city as the show was produced and aired, none of which are substantive enough or widely distributed enough to get the show over WP:GNG as a topic of enduring national or international significance all by themselves if no wider attention can be shown. It needs, but doesn't have, quite a bit more sourcing than this to be notable enough — there just isn't anything here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have more sourcing than just a few short blurbs in its own hometown media. (Also conflict of interest, as the creator's username corresponds to the name of the show's host.) Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.