- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 18:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Motorhomes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BAND . could find hardly any coverage, except this limited coveage in Swedish [1]. LibStar (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep that coverage in swedish is enough for me, this band is a swedish local band and is theirby not mentioned in egnlish sources etc etc.. I have heard of them so I find them notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Their music video to into the night is also played from time to time on the Swedish version of MTV. Also can be found on Youtube.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:IKNOWIT is not a reason for keeping. Neither is appearing from time to time on MTV. Please address how it meets WP:BAND and provide in depth sources. LibStar (talk) 02:40, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Still you cant deny that being broadcasted on MTVC does indicate notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I totally deny that. the criterion is WP:BAND simply appearing on MTV does not guarantee notability. LibStar (talk) 12:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Still you cant deny that being broadcasted on MTVC does indicate notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Two charting singles plus an article in Norrköpings Tidningar newspaper. Mattg82 (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- not sure the point of simply reaffirming another person's search with the words exactly. LibStar (talk) 03:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You have done a similar thing on Linda Norgrove. I respect you but please stop being a "Wikipedia-Nanny",--BabbaQ (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- not sure the point of simply reaffirming another person's search with the words exactly. LibStar (talk) 03:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Swedish language coverage is significant. Peter Karlsen (talk) 04:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.