Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lighthouse (Ana da Silva album)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- The Lighthouse (Ana da Silva album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has failed WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM since 2006. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. It has never failed either guideline, it's just a poor article. Review from Allmusic, CMJ New Music Monthly, SPIN, and Les Inrockuptibles easily establish notability, and there are a few pieces of further coverage ([1], [2]), and that's before we look through offline sources. --Michig (talk) 11:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. Article now improved using available online sources. --Michig (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep sufficient coverage to warrant an article per the sources Michig linked and implemented. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Plenty of significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.