Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Foundation Hymn
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Foundation Hymn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN song — Dædαlus Contribs 21:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting comment. This debate wasn't sorted so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A quick google search (yes, I know...) shows nothing of notability, and the only assertion is that the author merely says that it's notable. OK, why is it notable? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A boarding school alma mater deserves no more than a line or two in the school article. The word "notable" does not notable make. NTK (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a mention in the school's article is quite sufficient for the existence of the song, which does not achieve notability on its own. Benea (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The glaring lack of reliable sources is an obvious problem. Fences&Windows 00:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.