Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flick Law Firm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Flick Law Firm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Personal injury law firm that fails WP:NCORP. The awards are not convincing: many, many firms and lawyers are rated in some capacity by Avvo, and being reviewed by the BBB is hardly an award. Parroting Scope_creep here, I'd also call this native advertising. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:MILL law firm; only claim is to the pseudo-awards. TJRC (talk) 05:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article reads like promotional literature. Cases contested in court are primary references. Not admissible. Other references are not found, or primary. -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete among WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:ADV, I would add that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting server. I'd be good with WP:SPEEDY under WP:G11.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete precisely per nom. BD2412 T 15:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a promotional component of a law firm's social media portfolio. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.