Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fearless Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. partially due to the lack of complete deletion rationale. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The Fearless Collective

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Fearless Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NO SIGNIFICANCE Thewikizoomer (talk) 19:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Organizations, and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep. As I stated when I decided the Fearless Collective article was not eligible for speedy delete, there are plenty of reliable sources that prove the notability of this artist collective. In addition to the reliable sources already in the article, a quick Google News search returns 616 results including coverage of this group in the Kashmir Observer, The Daily Star (link), Homegrown, The Sunday Times (link), News9Live (link), The New Indian Express (link), The Express Tribune (link), Business Standard (link), and many more not listed here. And in addition to that the Wikipedia Library returns even more articles about this group in journals and magazines such as Bitch Magazine, Development, Women's Studies in Communication, The Journal of Women in Culture & Society, and more. While this article does need a lot of work, the Fearless Collective easily meet Wikipedia's notability standards.--SouthernNights (talk) 22:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep per the large number of good refs. Consider “speedy keeping”.

—A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.