Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Examiner (Beaumont)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Examiner (Beaumont) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years, unreferenced. Puffin Let's talk! 15:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as sources added since this nomination push the subject across the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notability established through secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.