Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bob Szajner Triad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bob Szajner Triad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a mess. The best thing to do is delete and start over. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I won't dispute the messiness, but that's more an issue implying editing than deletion? In terms of notability, there are online reviews at reputable sources, such as this 2008 AllAboutJazz review. Feels like an issue of judging how far down to a bare stub this needs to be taken. AllyD (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - the nominator should know better than to use messiness as a rationale for deletion. See WP:UGLY. It needs some edit tags, which I will add. I think the source located by AllyD helps out, but we could probably use some more sources from experts in that field. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While this article presents itself as a musical project, the content, in reality presents a biography of an individual where notability has not been established. Cindamuse (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.