Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas College Republicans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to College Republicans. Per WP:ORG#Local_units_of_larger_organizations (non-admin closure) Vaca tion 9 00:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Texas College Republicans

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

State-level arm of the national College Republicans--notability is not inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED). No evidence of stand-alone notability through WP:GNG or WP:ORG. GrapedApe (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to College Republicans per WP:ORG#Local units of larger organizations. Subject appears to have received multiple mentions from published reliable sources. However, non of the coverage has the subject as the primary subject of the content, and in total I cannot see the multiple mentions amassing to be considered significant coverage. Therefore, any verified content can be merged to the parent organization's article, and a redirect left in this article's place.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - RightCow makes a very logical statement.— -dainomite 01:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.