Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Telik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Written based largely on 10-K form and company web site, almost a copyvio. Going to AFD rather than PROD or CSD for the explicit purpose of preventing re-creation until an editor can find reliable source references to demonstrate that the company is notable. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment by nominator: If the company is notable, the article needs to be fundamentally re-written. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORP. No significant independent references in the article. The only coverage I found in a search was a 2006 report about one of their drugs not working. Funny, the article under discussion doesn't mention that. --MelanieN (talk) 00:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No indication of significance or importance. Being a public traded company does not assert notability. Routine stock market reports, corporate listings, press releases, and primary sources. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:ORGDEPTH. WP:NOTYELLOW. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This article is one of around 62 mass produced from stock exchange listings. All either PRODed now, or those that have run their 7 days at AfD have been deleted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.