- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- TeamBglobal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable sponsored cycle racing team. This search yields only 10 google hits, all of them totally irrelevant for establishing notability. Fails WP:N. andy (talk) 13:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I also failed to find any significant coverage in reliable sources for this cycling team. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable "amateur racers who want to make their mark in cycling." I can't find any significant coverage of this team. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.