- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Kittie. Davewild (talk) 21:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tara McLeod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only known for being a one major ban. Does not meet the criteria needed for a page of her own. magnius (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You should have simply redirected her page to her band's article, Kittie. Obviously the band members are likely search terms, so we'd want redirects in place instead of just deleting outright. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, and at the same time consider redirecting the other band members' pages. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw the nom and redirect: That way in case a substantive article on her can be written (unlike the current content), its easily enough done in the future.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, Kudpung has the right idea. It's common practice to make artists who aren't notable outside their band to become redirect pages, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Tuck for an example. He's Gone Mental 15:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.