Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamboti Tent Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to Kruger National Park#Rest camps. Consensus dictates these do not have individual notability. However, no prejudice against the future recreation of a list of rest camps if the section at Kruger National Park gets large. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 21:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tamboti Tent Camp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable camping facility within a national park, lacks references to significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:[reply]

Redirect to Kruger National Park#Rest camps. I would remind the nominator that WP:BEFORE requires various steps before nominating pages for deletion, one of which is "Consider turning the page into a useful redirect or proposing it be merged." If, in fact, this was considered and rejected then the reasons should be included in the nomination. The images can be merged into the target. An introductory section can be sourced from material such as [1][2][3][4] TerriersFan (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment' I would remind this editor that there needs to be something worth merging into the target, thus the deletion discussion. If consensus is that there is sufficient content there to merge, then so be it, but I'm not seeing it in these articles.--RadioFan (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
redirect/merge - no independent notability. Mukadderat (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
MERGE - I'm not sure if 'merge' is exactly what I mean to say. It seems to me that these 21 different camps & 15 lodges within this national park could stand on their own as an article. 'Rest Camps and Lodges in Kruger National Park' or something like that -- rather than all the details of each of them being added to the main Kruger National Park article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centerone (talk • contribs) 07:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.