Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take a Worm for a Walk Week

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Take a Worm for a Walk Week

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not appear to satisfy WP:NBAND. – DarkGlow • 23:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 23:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 23:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 23:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's one viable review of their album ([1]) at The Skinny and one slightly suspect review of their final show ([2]) on the same site. Other than that, I didn't find much. Not enough to pass WP:BAND, anyhow. — sparklism ^hey! 12:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Sparklism. Strange name for a band though. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I would concur with the view that the lack of available third party sources and coverage suggests that they are not notable enough to have an article. Dunarc (talk) 22:55, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.