- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- TM 103 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still WP:CRYSTAL for an album that may or may not happen. Article has been deleted several times before under different names, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thug Motivation 103 (2nd nomination) -Lilac Soul (Talk • Contribs) 23:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I support this deletion, considering that the article has been deleted 2 times already. Petiatil »Talk 22:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep" - I will fix this article, but there have been multiple singles and a lot of info. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 04:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Incubate or Merge the most obvious. TbhotchTalk C. 19:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thug Motivation 103 (2nd nomination) for the previous delete history. I have to admit that the latest so-called "confirmed" release date seems slightly more verifiable than previous. It's clear that many editors would love to see an article for this almost unreleasable album. I'd recommend waiting (and maybe salting) until the day after it is REALLY released, if ever. But incubating might also be reasonable. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and SALT until the release date Three is enough. I'd of CSDed this. Sven Manguard Talk 00:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - after perusing some of the sources in this version of the article, the title of the upcoming album is apparently still Thug Motivation 103, a title that I believe was salted after the first two AfD's. Therefore, it appears that people are still trying to create album articles that don't even display the correct title. What to do? --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Simple: Delete page, add SALT, sprinkle bans liberally. The recipe for handling problem page re-creators is a well known. Sven Manguard Talk 17:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - after perusing some of the sources in this version of the article, the title of the upcoming album is apparently still Thug Motivation 103, a title that I believe was salted after the first two AfD's. Therefore, it appears that people are still trying to create album articles that don't even display the correct title. What to do? --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, and SALT. If ever the record does get released, the author can request the article to be userfied, and if
notorietynotability can be clearly established, and can be perfectly sourced (no blogs, record listings, or self-published websites etc,), it can be moved to main space.--Kudpung (talk) 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.