Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swindle (Transformers)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Transformers characters. Consensus is that no independent article is needed for this character. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 20:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Swindle (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to List of Decepticons. BOZ (talk) 18:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Transformers characters per reasons already stated by nominator. Aoba47 (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lists of Transformers characters. Swindle has been in numerous continuities and was not always a Decepticon. I think this list will be more helpful to users than List of Decepticons . Argento Surfer (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lists of Transformers characters per Argento Surfer. There are not enough non-trivial sources for this character to have an independent article, and the above argument for the proper redirect target makes sense. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect. Merge any content if needed. Avoid redlink bait to recreate the article again, preserves history if ever needed. Montanabw(talk) 20:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.