Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suril Shah (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suril Shah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

procedural renomination after last nomination was not tracked well, with the following summary:

WP:VANITY article with no indication of this person's notability. KSAWikipedian (talk) 18:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KSAWikipedian (talk) 18:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Gujarat-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite some coverage in the trade press. His claim to fame is taking a lot of certification exams at a young age. Not quite up to par. Andrevan@ 19:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as I said at the original AfD: this was a blatant vanity article even by the standards of 2010, when this malformed nomination was created (but never linked to a daily logpage, and never added to one by a bot since it didn't have the proper AfD headers). By the standards of 2022, it seems even more gratuitous. I do not see notability here, or reliability in the sources used to make the claims. jp×g 01:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.