Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suhas Gopinath (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per several comments herein stating that the article is promotional, would benefit from copy editing (poorly written, needs work), etc., I have added the {{Cleanup AfD}} template to the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suhas Gopinath

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No grounds asserted for notability meeting WP:BIO. Gopinath's article looks like an advertisement & promotion article of the person and his brands, who has done lots of PR online but has not received any significant awards/recognition - WP:Notability. Seems a good business person from India but not notable. Vinay089 (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's poorly written but this meets WP:SIGCOV as there are numerous sources available.Passes WP:GNG WP:BIO. He's one of the youngest recipents of the Karnataka State Rajyothsa award. Seems notable enough. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- among the "self-promotional business person" articles this one is a standout. Being the "youngest among the 175 recipients of Karnataka's Rajyotsava Award" seems to offer some notability, along with being the youngest CEO. Sourcing is reasonable. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG WP:BIO. ---Metaphorical analysis (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article needs work but subject seems to be notable, had coverage in 2003, 2009 and 2015 in multiple sources, all of them significant and reliable, and he was the subject of those articles. meets WP:BIO CrispyGlover (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional bio, very little actual accomplish,ents. The nature of the bio is shown by having a sentence at the ending giving his university, but not bothering to mention what degree or when. This is typical of corporate bio writing. DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.