- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Chicane discography. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong in Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
seems to fail notabilityt. no context, one referance, can be included on main article. Alankc (talk) 00:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Chicane discography. It's a hit single and a valid search term.--Michig (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Chicane discography. Verifiable, but there isn't enough content (and possibly not enough coverage either) for a separate article. snigbrook (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Chicane discography per above. Agreed that this is a valid search term, but lean against keeping as there does not appear to be enough coverage for an independent article. Gongshow Talk 20:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.