Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanislavski in Practice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 04:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stanislavski in Practice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. — Timneu22 · talk 13:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this book isn't out yet, it's being released in September. It may or may not be notable in the future (it's published by Routledge, which is nothing to sneeze at), but at the moment this looks like autobiographical spam. Hairhorn (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an article being used to promote a book, yet to be released. It appears that the author of the book created the article. The article is a violation of policy, which requires that articles are not to be used as a means of promotion. Cindamuse (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Speedy, same reasons as above Crazy-dancing (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Advertisement Carrite (talk) 16:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia should not be used as a promo tool. Jusdafax 03:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.