Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staffan Jacobson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Staffan Jacobson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) A post to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anarchism#Staffan Jacobson found no major material.

In searches, do not confuse this author (born 1948) with the Staffan Jacobsson born in 1951, who works in technological research. Our 1948 Jacobson is an art historian that has not been widely regarded or reviewed for his work in that field, apart from one interview source (not used for notability) and one review. The current article focuses on his political background but we don't have any reliable, secondary sources that touch on this as being noteworthy or that warrant redirecting to another article on anarchism in Sweden.

The Swedish version of this article did not have additional sources for us to consider, but please {{ping}} me if you find non-English and offline sources to make a case for the independent notability of this topic. czar 11:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Sweden. czar 11:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficiently sourced to show notability. Sjö (talk) 12:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: as I noted earlier, [1] may have something. I'm sure we're missing things, but not at all sure they're WP:GNG- or WP:NAUTHOR-level things we're missing. Leaving the link here for convenience in case anyone wants to go digging. -- asilvering (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.