Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Physics Division

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Physics Division

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability unclear; upmerge proposed two years ago. Fgnievinski (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge into American Astronomical Society. I would say keep because two other divisions also happen to have their own articles (see American Astronomical Society#Divisions, or Division for Planetary Sciences and Division on Dynamical Astronomy). However, if a merge is more appropriate because notability is unclear, then I would support merging all three articles into American Astronomical Society for consistency. Bananasoldier (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge. There is no justification for deletion: searching finds plenty of references demonstrating notability. -- 120.23.88.172 (talk) 13:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - plenty of evidence of notability. PianoDan (talk) 18:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.