Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social media bank
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Social media bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no sources to establish that this is even a thing. Fails WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with Tom Morris. This article should be deleted. Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. --Sriharsh1234 08:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - standard searches found nothing relevant, fails WP:GNG. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 11:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.