Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirens (Cher Lloyd song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sirens (Cher Lloyd song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page fails per the policies of WP:SONGS. The artwork is not completed revealed; fails to source sufficient sources and has no chart history. A music video has not yet been produced. And the single has not yet been released in her native of UK; U.S. Billboard hasn't charted the song based off of pre-order only. Far too early for an article. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 03:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: - It's a single, so it can't be deleted. — ₳aron 12:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question for ₳aron. Why can't singles be deleted? --Richhoncho (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's had commercial release. Can't help that it didn't chart. — ₳aron 12:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's rubbish and you know it. Please read WP:SONGS - many people read that IF it is charted it is notable, but that's not right either. The only reason I am not saying delete is because the nomination is a little premature. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. (According to the article at least) It was sent to US radio today. There's a couple of good sources in the article, but there's a lot of unreliable ones too. I'd say wait it out for now. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The song still seems new so per Status I say wait it out for now. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.