Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simaran Kaur

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 December 26.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simaran Kaur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A google search brings details about Simran Kaur Hundal. I'm not able to find any substantial information about the subject. The available sources fail WP:SIGCOV. The subject does not appear to pass WP:NACTOR as well. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 16:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cyphoidbomb has deleted the article as G5. Though it is valid deletion rationale, but I think the article should be refunded, and this AfD should be given its due time. I would also agree if this AfD is speedy closed as G5? Still I think the better thing would be that article be refunded and deleted per this discussion. Thanks ─ The Aafī on Mobile (^talk) 20:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article was largely a copyright infringement, with giant swaths having been copied verbatim from here, for instance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AafiOnMobile and TheAafi: I have refunded the article, but deleted the copyvios. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cyphoidbomb. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (^talk) 20:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.