Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silay South Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Silay. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Silay South Elementary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Elementary schools are not automatically notable, and I find no indication that this particular school meets WP:GNG or WP:ORG. bonadea contributions talk 12:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Silay per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most unusual or noteworthy elementary schools are presumed non-notable. Carrite (talk) 07:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The school having been constructed in 1919 already qualifies it as an important cultural property under Article III Sec. 5 of the National Cultural Heritage Act of the Philippines. And is therefore notable.--RioHondo (talk) 13:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The school is founded 1919. The question is: Does the school has a building that dates back 1919 or atleast built 50 years ago to qualify under the Cultural Heritage Act. If it does, then the article must have a big chunk on its built heritage. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At least the Silay Heritage website does make that claim with a picture of the old structure made of wood.--RioHondo (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Silay per longstanding precedent as documented at WP:OUTCOMES. I don't see anything that makes this primary school particularly noteworthy. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.