Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siheung City Hall station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siheung City Hall station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade (talk) 02:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wonjong station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.

Redirect to Seohae Line#Stations per WP:NTRAINSTATION and WP:GNG. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 06:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea. Jumpytoo Talk 08:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to the line article. Reywas92^Talk 19:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect ALL to Seohae Line#Stations Djflem (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per refs added by Eastmain. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per cites added by Eastmain. –Davey2010^Talk 15:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There was consensus to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station, so I don't think we can redirect all of these. Not a bundled nom, each should be treated separately for now. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redireсt~~ Keep per edits since nomination. Suitskvarts (talk) 12:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references from the Korean article. More can probably be found. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis that the new references added are sufficient to meet WP:GNG. JaventheAldericky (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.